Project Bibliography

The distributed library: OAI for digital library aggregation: OAI scholars advisory panel meeting. (2005). Unpublished manuscript.

Join a social revolution.(2005). Nature, 436(7054), 1066-1066.

American Political Science Association. (2005). American political science association website. Retrieved October 26, 2005 from http://www.apsanet.org/

Atkinson, R. (2001). Contingency and contradiction: The place(s) of the library at the dawn of the new millennium. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(1), 3-11.

Australian Research Council. (Unknown). The australian e-humanities research network: Leveraging digital scholarship in the humanities. Retrieved October 19, 2005 from http://www.ehum.edu.au/arc-report/context.html#introduction

Awre, C. (2004). CREE survey: Results and comment (Survey Results No. S1D9)University of Hull/JISC.

Bandilla, W., Bosnjak, M., & Altdorfer, P. (2003). Survey administration effects?: A comparison of web-based and traditional written self-administered surveys using the ISSP environment module. Social Science Computer Review, 21(2), 235.

Barbour, R. S. (2003). The newfound credibility of qualitative research? tales of technical essentialism and co-option. Qualitative Health Research, 13(7), 1019.

Baron, J., & Siepmann, M. (1999). Techniques for creating and using web questionnaire in research and teaching. Retrieved June 7, 2005, 2005 from http://www.psych.upenn.edu/~barron/examples/baron4.htm

Bartlett, J. C., & Toms, E. G. (2005). Developing a protocol for bioinformatics analysis: An integrated information behavior and task analysis approach. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(5), 469-482.

Bates, M. J. (2001). Information needs and seeking of scholars and artists in relation to multimedia materials

Berman, F., & Brady, H. (2005). Final report: NSF SBE-CISE workshop on cyberinfrastructure and the social sciences

Besek, J. (2003). Copyright issues relevant to the creation of a digital archive: A preliminary assessment (CLIR Report No. pub112). Washington, D.C.: Digital Library Federation - Council on Library and Information Resources.

Bezat, B., Donnelly, D., Kiple, J., Lilyard, C., Maloney, T., & Nichols, J., et al. (2005). Report of the instructional media task force

Bland, C. J. (2005). The research-productive department : Strategies from departments that excel. Bolton, Mass.: Anker Pub.

Borgman, C. L., Smart, L. J., Millwood, K. A., Finley, J. R., Champeny, L., & Gilliland, A. J., et al. (2005). Comparing faculty information seeking in teaching and research: Implications for the design of digital libraries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(6), 636-657.

Bowman, P. (2001). Proper impropriety: The proper-ties of cultural studies (some more aphorisms, apriorisms, and aporias). [Electronic version]. Parallax 7.2, , 50.

Brockman, W. S., Neumann, L., Palmer, C. L., & Tidline, T. J. (2001). Scholarly work in the humanities and the evolving information environment. Washington, D.C.: Digital Library Federation, Council on Library and Information Resources.

Brusilovsky, P., Farzan, R., & Ahn, J. (2005). Comprehensive personalized information access in an educational digitial library. JCDL '05, Denver, CO. 9-18. from http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1065385.1065388

Buchanan, G., Bainbridge, D., Don, K. J., & Witten, I. H. (2005). A new framework for building digital library collections. Fifth ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, Denver, CO. 23-31. from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/july05/sumner/07sumner.html

Cantor, N., & Schomberg, S. (2003). Poised between 2 worlds: The university as monastery and markeplace. EDUCAUSE Review, 38(2), 12-21.

Carbo, T. (2001). Regarding reading: On a methodological approach. Discourse & Society, 12(1), 59-89.

Carini, R. M., Hayek, J. C., Kuh, G. D., Kennedy, J. M., & Ouimet, J. A. (2003). College student responses to web and paper surveys: Does mode matter. Research in Higher Education, 44(1)

Center on Women and Public Policy. (2005). Feminist research methods: References and examplars. Retrieved October 19, 2005 from http://www.hhh.umn.edu/centers/wpp/research_methods.html

Chaison, J. D. (2003). Everything old is new again":Research collections at the american antiquarian society. Library Trends 52.1, , 14.

Coderre, F., Mathieu, A., & St. Laurent, N. (2004). Comparison of the quality of qualitative data obtained through telephone, postal and email surveys. [references]. International Journal of Market Research, 46(3), 347-357.

Cole, S. T. (May 2005). Comparing mail and web-based survey distribution methods: Results of surveys to leisure travel retailers. Journal of Travel Research, 43

Crane, G. (1998). The perseus project and beyond: How building a digital library challenges the humanities and technology. D-Lib Magazine,

Crawford, S., McCabe, S. E., & Pope, D. (2005). Applying web-based survey design standards. [references]. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 29(1-2), 43-66.

Cronin, B. (2003). Scholarly communication and epistemic cultures. Scholarly Tribes and Tribulations: How Tradition and Technology are Driving Disciplinary Change. Washington DC. 1-20.

Crow, R. (2002). A case for institutional repositories: A SPARC position paper. Washington, D.C.: SPARC The Scholarly Publishing & Academic Resources Coalition.

Dempsey, L. (2006). The (digital) library environment: Ten years after
. Retrieved March 25, 2006, 2006 from http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue46/dempsey/

Dempsey, L. (2004). The recombinant library: Portals and people. Journal of Library Administration, 39(4), 103-136.

Dempsey, L., & Lavoie, B. (2005). DLF service framework for digital libraries: A progress report for the DLF steering committee

Dye, J. (2006). Folksonomy: A game of high-tech (and high-stakes) tag. EContent, 29(3), 38-43.

Edmond, J. (2005). The role of the professional intermediary in expanding the humanities computing base. Literary & Linguistic Computing 20.3, , 367.

Effective Arts, I. (2003). Effective arts: Social science research methodologies. Retrieved October 19, 2005 from http://www.effectivearts.com/socialscience_research.html

Ellis, C. (1994). Feeling our way through the field. Qualitative Sociology, 17(3), 311.

European Humanities Research Centre. (2004). Report on the future of the humanities. Retrieved October 19, 2005 from http://www.ehrc.ox.ac.uk/events/Future.html

Fawcett, B., & Hearn, J. (2004). Researching others: Epistemology, experience, standpoints and participation. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 7(3), 201-218.

Fichter, D. (2006). Intranet applications for tagging and folksonomies. Online, 30(3), 43-45.

Flynn, P. (2000). The changing structure of the social science research industry and some implications for practice. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(10), 1578-1601.

Foster, A. (2004). A nonlinear model of information-seeking behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(3), 228-237.

Foster, Allen and Nigel Ford. (2003). Serendipity and information seeking: An empirical study. Journal of Documentation 59.3, , 321.

Franklin, B., & Plum, T. (2004). Library usage patterns in the electronic information environment. Information Research, 9(4)

French, J. C., & Viles, C. L. (1999). Personalized information environments: An architecture for customizable access to distributed digital libraries. D-Lib Magazine, 5(6). Retrieved February 17, 2005, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june99/french/06french.html

Fried Foster, N., & Gibbons, S. (2005). Understanding faculty to improve content recruitment for institutional repositories. D-Lib Magazine, 11(1)

Friedlander, A. (2002). Dimensions and use of the scholarly information environment: Introduction to a data set assembled by the digital library federation and outsell, inc. (CLIR Report No. pub110). Washington, D.C.: Digital Library Federation - Council on Library and Information Resources.

Frischer, B. (2005). The ultimate internet cafe: Reflections of a practicing digital humanist about designing a future for the research library in the digital age. (CLIR Report No. Pub 129)Council on Library and Information Resources.

Fyffe, R. (2002). Technological change and the scholarly communications reform movement. Library Resources & Technical Services, 46(2), 50-61.

Fyffe, R., Ludwig, D., & Warner, B. F. (2005). Digital preservation in action: Toward a campus-wide Program . EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research Research Bulletin, 2005(19), 1-17.

Fyffe, R., Ludwig, D., & Warner, B. F. (2005). Digital preservation: A campus-wide perspective. EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research Research Bulletin, 2005(18), 1-10.

Garber, M. (2005). Why can't young scholars write their second books first. Journal of Scholarly Publishing 36.3, , 129.

Gardner, W. (1990). The electronic archive: Scientific publishing for the 1990s. Psychological Science, 1(6), 333-358.

Google. (2005). Google directory: Arts/Humanities. Retrieved October 19, 2005 from http://www.google.com/Top/Arts/Humanities/

Google. (2005). Google directory: Social sciences directors. Retrieved October 19, 2005 from

Greenstein, D., & Thorin, S. E. (2002). The digital library: A biography. Washington, D.C.: Digital Library Federation - Council on Library and Information Resources.

Grinker, R. R. (2003). From the editor. Anthropological Quarterly, 76(2), 203.

Heery, R., Carpenter, L., & Day, M. (April 2001). Renardus project developments and the wider digital library context. D-Lib Magazine, 7(4), February 18, 2005 . Retrieved February 18, 2005, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/april01/heery/04heery.html

Heinrichs, J. H., & Lim, J. S. (2005). Model for organizational knowledge creation and strategic use of information. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 56(6), 620-629.

Heinstrom, J. (2005). Fast surfing, broad scanning and deep diving: The influence of personality and study approach on students' information-seeking behavior. Journal of Documentation, 61(2), 228-247.

Hurd, J. M. (2000). The transformation of scientific communication: A model for 2020. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(14), 1279-1283.

Jackson, M. E. (2004). The future of interlending. Interlending and Document Supply, 32(2), 88-93.

Jensen, M., Gordon, G., Barnes, S. & Infantino, B. (2005). Social science research network: Frequently asked questions. Retrieved February 18, 2005 from http://www.ssrn.com/update/general/ssrn_faq.html

Johanson, G., Schauder, F., & Lim, E. (1998). The virtual library and the humanities: A reportAustralian Humanities Review.

Jones, S. (2002). The internet goes to college: How student are living in the future with today's technology.

(Pew Internet and American Life. Washington, D.C.: Pew Internet and American Life Project.

Jones, S., Ph.D. (2005). The internet goes to college: College students, faculty and internet use. Unpublished manuscript.

Kahn, R., & Wilensky, R. (1995). A framework for distributed digital object services. Unpublished manuscript.

Kanter, J. (2005, October 3, 2005). The idea economy: Battle over right to sell knowledge. International Herald Tribune, pp. 1-2.

Katz, S. N. (2005). Why technology matters: The humanities in the twenty-first century. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 30.2, , 105.

Keller, M. A., Reich, V. A., & Herkovic, A. C. (2003). What is a library anymore, anyway? First Monday, 8(5), February 17, 2005 . Retrieved February 17, 2005, from http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue8_5/keller/index.html

King's College London. (2005). E-resources for research in the humanities and social sciences; A british academy policy review

Kling, R. (1999). What is social informatics and why does it matter? D-Lib Magazine, 5(1), February 17, 2005-27 . Retrieved February 18, 2005, from http://www.dlib.org/

Kling, R., & McKim, G. (2000). Not just a matter of time: Field differences and the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication . Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(14), 1306-1320.

Kott, K. (2005). DLF Aquifer Business PlanDigital Library Federation.

Krenz, C., & Sax, G. (1986). What quantitative research is and why it doesn't work. American Behavioral Scientist, 30(1), 58.

Krichel, T. (2000). Working towards an open library for economics: The RePEc project `. PEAK Conference Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor MI.from http://www.si.umich.edu/PEAK-2000/program.htm

LaFollette, M. C. (1994). Research misconduct. Society, 31(3), 6.

Larsen, R., & Wactlar, H. (2004). Knowledge lost in information: Report of the NSF workshop on research directions for digital libraries (NSF Report No. NSF Award No. IIS-0331314). Chatham, MA: NSF. (Electronic Version)

Lee, J., & Poe, F. (2005). UCLA european integration portal: Metasearch assessment (Implementation study

Levy, D. M. (1999). The universe is expanding: Reflections on the social (and cosmic) significance of documents in a digital age. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science, 25(4), 17-20.

Lund University Libraries. (2005). Directory of open access journals. Retrieved October 19, 2005 from http://www.doaj.org/findjournals

Lustig, J. (2005). InfoAboutInfo briefing - TrendAlert: Google's impact on Libraries (Briefing No. Volume 8, April 15, 2005). Burlingame, CA: Outsell, Inc. (Electronic Version)

Lustig, J. (2004). InfoAboutInfo briefing - TrendAlert: The future of libraries (Briefing No. Volume 7, 1/9/2004). Burlingame, CA: Outsell, Inc. (Electronic Version)

Lynch, C. (2005). Ecure 2005 keynote address. Tempe AZ - Arizona State University.from http://www.asu.edu/ecure/2005/prenote/

Lynch, C. (2005). Where do we go from here? the next decade for digital libraries. D-Lib Magazine, 11(7/8)

Lynch, C. (2004). Reflections Towards the Development of a “Post-DL” Research Agenda. Chatham, MA:

Lynch, C. A. (2003). Institutional repositories: Essential infrastructure for scholarship in the digital age No. 226)ARL.

MacMullen, W. J., & Denn, S. O. (2005). Information problems in molecular biology and Bioinformatics . Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(5), 447-456.

McFedries, P. (2006). Folk wisdom. IEEE Spectrum, 43(2), 80-80.

Moore-Jansen, C. (1997). RESEARCH METHODS IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCES: A SELECTIVE BIBLIOGRAPHY. Retrieved October 19, 2005 from http://library.wichita.edu/socsci/reseabib.htm

O'Keefe, B. (2003). Impact of Tradition and Technology on the Social Sciences

Otto G. Richter Library, University of Miami. (2001). Research methods in the social sciences: An internet resource list. Retrieved October 19, 2005 from http://www.library.miami.edu/netguides/psymeth.html

Palmer, C. L. (2005). Scholarly work and the shaping of digital access. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 56(11), 1140-1153.

Peters, T. (2006). It's a tag, tag, tag, tag world. Young Adult Library Services, 4(3), 5-6.

Pritchard, S., Carver, L., & Anand, S. (2004). Campus Informatics: Collaboration for Knowledge Management. University of California - Santa Barbara:

Pritchard, S., Carver, L., & Anand, S. (2004). Research information management: Common concerns of UCSB faculty, librarians and Technologists (White Paper. Santa Barbara, CA: University of California - Santa Barbara Libraries. (Electronic Version)

Recker, M., Dorwald, J., Dawson, D., Halioris, S., Liu, Y., & Mao, X., et al. (2005). You can lead a horse to water: Teacher development and use of digital library resources. JCDL '05, Denver, CO. 1-8. from http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1065385.1065387

Rothstein, E. (2005, 14 November 2005). If books are on google, who gains and who loses? New York Times, pp. B3.

Roztocki, N., & Lahri, N. A. (2002). Is the applicability of web-based surveys for academic research limited to the field of information technology?

Sloan, B. (2005). Evolution takes a leap. Library Journal netConnect, 2-3

Smith, A. (1999). Why Digitize?. Washington, D.C.: Council on Library and Information Resources.

Snoeyink, J. (26 January 2005). Scholarly communications in a digital world: Results of informal survey on publication culturesUNC Computer Science.

Society for the Advancement of Scandinavian Study. (2005). Society for the advancement of scandinavian study. Retrieved November 14, 2005 from http://www.byu.edu/sasslink/#

Solow, Robert M., et. al. and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. (2002). Making the humanities count: The importance of data. Retrieved November 02, 2005 from http://www.amacad.org/publications/monographs/Making_the_Humanities_Count.pdf

Spetland, C. (2004). University libraries faculty focus groups (Internal. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Libraries.

Stanford, E. B. (1976). History of university of minnesota libraries

Steneck, N. H. (2003). The role of professional societies in promoting integrity in research. American Journal of Health Behavior, 27, S239-S247.

Strohlein, M., & Watson Healy, L. (2003). Information about information briefing - TrendAlert: XML and web services - the asteroids that will blow up 500 years of publishing history (Briefing No. Volume 6, Number 15, 6/20/2003). Burlingame, CA: Outsell, Inc. (Electronic Version)

Telban, B. (2001). Bibliography of fieldwork, research methods and ethnography in sociocultural anthropology. Retrieved October 19, 2005 from http://coombs.anu.edu.au/Biblio/biblio_fieldwork1.html

The Economist. (2005). A library at your fingertips. Retrieved 09 November 2005, 2005 from http://www.economist.com/agenda/displaystory.cfm?story_id=5130451

Thomas, S. E. (2002). Models for Academic Support: Restructuring Organizations for Cost-Effective Information Services: A Proposal to the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation from the Cornell University Library. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Library.

Thorin, S. E. (2003). Global changes in scholarly communication

Townsend, R. B. (2003). History and the future of scholarly publishing. American Historical Association: The Professional Association for all Historians,

Trouteaud, A. R. (2004). How you ask counts: A test of internet-related components of response rates to a web-based survey. Social Science Computer Review, 22(3), 385-362.

University of London. (2005). King's college london-- school of humanities graduate studies. Retrieved October 17, 2005 from http://www.kcl.ac.uk/depsta/humanities/schoff/grad/

University of Minnesota Libraries, & Minnesota Center for Survey Research. (2005). Survey of CLA Faculty & Graduate Students about Research Practices in the Humanities & Social Sciences. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Libraries.

Unknown. (2005). Internet social research methodology. Retrieved October 19, 2005 from http://construct.haifa.ac.il/~azy/refmetho.htm

Unsworth, J. (2006). Scholarly primitives: What methods do humanities researchers have in common, and how might our tools reflect this? Retrieved May 9, 2006, May 9, 2006 from http://www.iath.virginia.edu/~jmu2m/Kings.5-00/primitives.html

Unsworth, J. (2000). The scholar in the digital library. Institue for Advanced Technology in the Humanities,

Unsworth, J. (2000). Scholarly Primitives: What Methods do Humanities Researchers have in Common, and how might our Tools Reflect this?

Vandergrift, K. E. (2005). Research methods on the world wide web. Retrieved October 19, 2005 from http://www.scils.rutgers.edu/~kvander/researchmethods.html

Vega Garcia, Susan A. (2005). Recommended african american websites
diversity and ethnic studies. Retrieved October 17, 2005 from http://www.public.iastate.edu/~savega/afr_amer.htm

Virginia Tech University Library. (2004). Bibliography on evaluating web information. Retrieved October 26, 2005 from http://www.lib.vt.edu/help/instruct/evaluate/evalbiblio.html

Wouters, P. (2005). The virtual knowledge studio for the humanities and social sciences. Retrieved October 19, 2005 from http://www.niwi.knaw.nl/nl/maatschappijwetenschappen/steinmetzarchief/newsletter/virtual_knowledge_studio/