Welcome to our new site!

Search for books, journals, articles, media and more in Libraries search at the top of every page on our site.

Strategic digitization program

The Digitization Review Group, in cooperation with Digital Library Services (DLS), solicits proposals from all Libraries units for projects to digitize analog materials in all formats. The purpose of the projects may be to enable or increase access to content, to preserve the content of rare, fragile, or at-risk collections, or both reasons.

Project selection

The Digitization Review Group is charged with evaluating proposals and establishing the necessary project priorities. Through this digitization program, we intend to provide patrons with greater access to our own unique, distinctive collections by focusing exclusively on those materials that fall outside the scope of the Google Digitization Program.

The group will solicit proposals twice each year.

Digitization of materials will be either completed or managed through the Libraries’ Digital Library Services department. While most projects will be digitized by our own staff and students, some projects may be selected for outsourcing to an external vendor. Any decision to outsource will be first discussed with the project sponsor and, if necessary, with the collection curator or manager.

The committee encourages proposals of all media types. While the Digital Library Services department has limited support for the conversion of audio and visual materials, in most cases these projects can be outsourced to one of several trusted vendors. The Libraries has deep experience working with these qualified vendors.

Back to top

Proposal development

A good proposal is one that is well articulated and addresses the questions directly and clearly. The focus of the proposal should be on how this project best supports the evaluative criteria and overall strategic goals of the program. Be sure to address how your proposed document aligned with the criteria outlined in the Digitization Framework document. An example of a good proposal from a previous year has been provided to help you shape your own proposals.

Project size

There’s no “right” size project, but we are looking for proposals that build, or add to, a critical mass of content for researchers, regardless of size. Regardless of the size of the project, the materials in the proposal should either

  • represent a discrete collection or body of content that provides adequate context to users
  • build upon existing University digital holdings and projects, or
  • expand coverage of a subject or theme available as digital content at other institutions.

While there is no limitation to the size of projects that can be proposed, the Digitization Review Group may recommend that very large projects be broken down into phases or staged over a longer period of time.

Expectations

It is not expected that you will have to be deeply involved at all stages of a digitization project, just because you submitted the proposal. However, we do expect that you will act as an advocate for your project, helping to shepherd it to completion. That might take the form of

  • answering additional questions during the review or planning processes
  • coordinating communications between different groups, or
  • or providing specialized knowledge for metadata generation

If your proposal involves a faculty member, you would probably remain the primary contact between that faculty member and Libraries staff throughout the project.

Metadata

Libraries' staff will be available to help in shaping the necessary metadata. As a content expert and/or project proposer you may be called upon to consult with metadata staff to ensure that the project is well described.

In your proposal, please provide at least a first-pass answer to the following non-copyright and copyright questions.

Non-copyright questions

  • Do the materials depict individual people, or provide detailed records of one or more people’s lives? (For example: diaries, personal correspondence, medical or school records, etc.) There might be privacy or reputational issues to consider.
  • Do the materials depict, or did the materials originate with, a group of people who might have cultural concerns for how they are shared with the public? (For example: materials collected from indigenous peoples, materials of spiritual significance to one or more groups, materials involving subcultural activities or practices.) Digitization planning may need to involve community outreach and involvement.

Copyright questions

  • Are the materials definitely in the public domain in the U.S.?
    • Were they 1) published, 2) in the U.S., 3) before 1923?
    • Are they federal government documents?
  • If not, are the materials -possibly- in the public domain?
    • Were they all published before 1963?
    • Were they all published before 1978? (These are much less likely to be public domain than pre-’63 works, but still possible…)
    • Are they state government documents?
  • If the materials are not likely to be in the public domain, do you think their owners/creators are findable? Why or why not?
  • If the materials are not likely to be in the public domain, is the digitization project a very new approach to their re-use? (E.g., scanning whole in-copyright books in order to make them -searchable-, but not sharing the full text with searchers…)

Please note that no single answer to any of these questions will disqualify a proposal - they are just some of the practicalities we’ll be taking into consideration.

Back to top

Project timeline

The time to complete each project is based on two factors. First, the size, scope and type of materials proposed for digitization will determine the length of time it takes to complete. The Digital Library Services department would be happy to provide you an estimate. The Second and more important factor in determining the time for completing a project rests with the selection committee. In addition to selecting projects of distinction, this group will also bear the responsibility for prioritizing and ranking each project. This clear indication on order will allow digitization staff with a clear and focused path for completing all of this projects. The committee does recognize that some proposals may be time-sensitive in nature. If your proposal needs to be completed by a certain date in order to support classroom education, research or scholarship support please be sure to indicate that on your proposal form. The committee will consider this information when selecting and ranking proposals.

Back to top

Working with faculty

The Digitization Review Group encourages librarians and other staff submitting proposals to engage with faculty and departments across campus to ensure that our digitization efforts help to support their teaching, research and scholarship. To help foster this dialog, the digitization review group has created the following documents.

Talking Points - Digital Library Services & the Strategic Digitization Program

Letter to Liaisons

Back to top

Resources

Digitization Framework

Digitization Task Force Recommendations

Libraries' Open Sharing Policy

Back to top